Even Odd... the combination of these words seem to have acquired a new meaning suddenly, at least in Delhi these days and is being looked upon as a potential weapon to prove a political point over opponents. The common people, who are expected to adjust their daily lives under the scheme, are the least important part of this game - they are the ones who have to establish their credentials of being good citizens by subjecting themselves to walking /running / suffering and paying (some times even looted) when not otherwise due. Its a common office goer who has to answer as why he decided to take out his car on a day when not due, without any reference to the extreme social / official / personal commitments that he may be under. And of course he has no right to question as to why he does not have access to comfortable and efficient Public Transport in the city - and if he does - he must have joined the opposition political party or must be having plans to do so.
Initially announced under pressure from Courts (not an original thought of the group claiming credit for), the scheme had been tried in many cities of the world including Mexico City (Mexico), Bogota (Columbia), Paris (France), Beijing (China) and has had mixed results with debatable data of its success. Most of these experiments, however, have not resulted in any permanent solution for problem of either pollution or road congestion. In cases where even-odd type of arrangements were implemented for a longer duration, the benefits not only diminished gradually but also turned negative where people resorted to buying a second two or four wheeler to steer through the restrictions (Mexico City). So the scheme remains as a temporary experiment at best and not a permanent solution to the problems of air quality and number of vehicles on road.
On the other hand, there are examples of cities that have very convenient and efficient public transport system where people themselves generally avoid using private vehicles (Seoul, Singapore, Berlin, Zurich). Delhi Metro is an example at home which has become so very popular from day one. In all such cases the public transport becomes a preferred choice of people, as inherently people loathe driving in the mad rush of a city like Delhi. General public, intelligent as they are, will always prefer a cost effective, efficient and convenient mode of travel. It is only in the absence of alternatives that they are forced to drive out privately on a daily basis.
Any long term solution, therefore, does not lie in forcing the scheme of road rationing down the throat of common man, but in providing an alternate means that people would automatically select. The government cannot divert the attention from its failure to provide public transport system that cares for its people by placing these hurdles in an otherwise extremely challenging life of common man. Its the ruling class that has to answer for its corruption and ill planning that has shaped public transport in our cities and its very odd to even seek answers from common man as to how good citizen he is.
Just a passing thought....